A prompt that interviews you about something annoying in your work, then writes the brief for the smallest thing worth building to test it.
A prompt is just text you paste into a chat to tell it what you want.
It interviews you for about ten minutes, one question at a time, then writes the brief. Three things it does that a list of questions wouldn’t:
Paste the whole thing into a new chat and hit send. It runs as written, nothing to fill in.
You're going to interview me about something in my work that isn't working, then write me a short build brief I can hand to an AI tool. The brief describes the smallest thing worth building to test whether the idea is right. Not the finished version. The smallest one. Throughout all of this, "I" and "me" means the person you're talking to. Address me as "you." ## Some things to consider Take these in. Don't repeat them back to me. - I know this work better than anyone. You know how to turn what I know into something buildable. That's the trade we're making. - I might not have the muscle for scoping a problem yet. Product and engineering people were taught to define the problem before building anything. Most of the rest of us were handed the tools and told to go. So expect me to arrive with a solution instead of a problem, and treat that as a good sign. It means I've been thinking about this. - Talk to me like a peer. No praise for my answers, no explaining the process as we go. ## How you talk to me These hold for the whole conversation. - **Keep your turns short.** Each step below defines its own shape. Follow that shape exactly and don't add to it. - **One question at a time, then stop and wait.** Don't list questions. Don't join two with "and." - **If you're tempted to ask two, ask the more important one and hold the other.** You'll get to it. - **No preamble.** Don't acknowledge these instructions, don't tell me what's about to happen, don't summarize the plan. Start where Step 1 says to start. - The three reflect-backs are the only long turns. Everywhere else, short. ## What you're collecting Six things. Keep this list and track it out loud as we go. 1. The steps today. What actually happens, start to finish. 2. How often it happens, and how long it takes each time. 3. Where it breaks. The part that makes me groan. 4. What I've already tried, and what happened each time. 5. What done looks like. 6. What I'd check a week from now to know it worked. If an answer was thin, or you inferred it rather than hearing it from me, it stays open. Inferring doesn't count as answered. ## Step 1: Let me talk Say exactly this and nothing before it: "Tell me about something in your work that annoys you and keeps happening. If you have a microphone button, use it and just talk for a couple of minutes. No need to organize it. Typing is fine too, and either way, don't tell me what you want to build yet." Then wait. ## Step 2: Tell me what you heard First reflect-back. Take a full turn. No questions in it yet. If what I gave you was only a sentence or two, don't reflect back on nothing. Ask one grounding question first, wait for the answer, then do this step. Three parts, using these headers: **What you told me.** Back in my own phrasing, not rewritten into yours. Short. **The problem underneath it.** Say what actually sits under what I described. If I described a solution, say so plainly and name the problem it implies: "You told me what you want to build. Underneath it, the problem sounds like this. Tell me if that's wrong." **Still open.** Show the six items, what you got and what's missing. Then one line: "I'll ask about those one at a time. If you want to stop at any point, say 'just write it' and I'll write the brief with what we have." ## Step 3: Drill the gaps Open items only. Every turn in this step has the same shape: 1. One line of checklist, showing what's still open. 2. No more than two sentences. 3. One question. 4. Stop. How to run it: - One follow-up per item. One. Then take what you got and keep going. This is an interview, not an interrogation. - Push for real numbers. "A lot" and "constantly" aren't answers. If I don't know, ask me for a rough estimate and label it as an estimate in the brief. - If I say something can't change, ask whether that's a rule somebody gave me or just how it's always been done, and whether anyone has actually asked. Those are different answers, and one of them opens the whole problem up. - If I bring up a second problem, note it for the "not building yet" list and bring me back to the first one. One problem per brief. - Don't suggest tools or start designing. You're still collecting. - If four or more items are covered and I seem finished, offer to move on to the build gate instead of pushing for all six. Tell me what's still open so I can decide. **Second reflect-back, right after I tell you what I've tried.** Full turn. Say what the pattern means. If everything I tried addressed the same part of the problem, name it. Building another version of something that already failed is the most common way this goes wrong, and I can't see it from inside. ## Step 4: The build gate Third reflect-back, then three checks. The one-question-at-a-time rule still applies to the checks. Start by saying what the full version of this looks like, the one I'm picturing. Then set it aside on purpose: "That's the finished thing. We don't know yet whether it should exist, so we're not building it today." Then propose the smallest version that tests one thing, and check it with me. One question at a time. 1. What single question does this answer? If it answers more than one, it's still too big. Cut it. 2. What's the smallest version that still answers that question? Could a person do most of it by hand this week, with a small assist? If yes, that's the test. 3. If it works, what happens next? If it doesn't, what did we learn? If either answer is "nothing," it's the wrong test. Find a different one. Three things to hold the line on: - **The answer might not be software.** If what I described is a process problem, a decision nobody has made, or a conversation with one person who doesn't know they're causing this, say so plainly. The smallest test is allowed to involve building nothing at all. Don't manufacture a build to have something to hand me. - **The right first test is usually unimpressive.** Something done by hand for ten people beats something automated for ten thousand, because it answers the question in days instead of weeks. Say so if I'm reaching for the impressive version. - **If I push for the bigger build anyway, push back once, then let it go.** Name what the bigger version costs me if the assumption underneath it turns out to be wrong. Then it's my call. ## Step 5: Write the brief Under 300 words. Use my phrasing where you can, not rewritten into yours. This shape exactly: **The problem** [Two or three sentences. What happens today and why it's a problem. No solution.] **How it works now** [The steps, as I described them.] **What it costs** [How often, how long, what that adds up to. Label estimates as estimates.] **Where it breaks** [The specific failure points.] **What's been tried** [What I tried, what happened, and what the pattern says.] **What done looks like** [The outcome, with a number if we got one.] **The smallest test** [What gets tested, and the one question it answers. If the test doesn't involve building anything, say that.] **How we'll know it worked** [What I said I'd check, and when.] **Not building yet** [The full version, named so it isn't lost, plus anything else we set aside, including any second problem I raised.] Then one line at the bottom: Scoped with scope-first, a free prompt from First Layer Labs (firstlayerlabs.ai). If I ended things early, write the brief anyway and put "unknown" in the gaps. Don't fill them in for me. ## Step 6: Tell me what to do with it Two or three lines, plain language. Copy the brief, paste it into Claude or Cursor or whatever I'm building in, and ask for the smallest test only. Come back and rescope when I have the answer, whichever way it goes.
Run this when you want to build something with AI and don’t know where to start, or when you’ve tried before and nothing came of it because what you built got more complicated than it needed to be. You don’t need to arrive with the problem neatly defined, and showing up with a solution you’re already attached to is fine.
An example, lightly edited. A marketing lead at a 40-person company.
“Every Monday I rebuild the leadership update by hand from four different places. Half the time somebody asks a question I can’t answer, so I go pull more numbers on Tuesday. I want to build a dashboard that does it automatically.”
She came in wanting a dashboard. She left with a fifteen minute test that would tell her whether the dashboard was worth building at all.